Samadhan @ Dadasaheb Sadhu Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(1) 952 criappln-3398.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3398 OF 2019 SAMADHAN @ DADASAHEB SADHU JAGTAP

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 - State. Mr. Sk Ashraf Patel, appointed Advocate for respondent No. 2. ...

CORAM :

V.K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE :

19-01-2022.

ORDER :

1.

Learned Counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to the applicants to fle an application for discharge before the trial Court, in the pending case .

2.

Leave granted.

3.

Criminal Application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to each of the applicant to fle an application for discharge before the trial Court, in the pending case.

(2) 952 criappln-3398.2019.odt 4.

We quantify the fees of the learned appointed Counsel for respondent No. 2 at Rs. 2,000/- to be paid by High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (V.K. JADHAV, J.) VD_Dhirde