← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13547/2023disposed off

Rajshri Dayanand Boyane Through Guardian Dayanand Sambhaji Boyane v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Sub Divisional Officer

2023-10-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote2 pages

17,18,22 and 23.WP.13547.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 17 WRIT PETITION NO.13547 OF 2023 RAJSHRI DAYANAND BOYANE THROUGH GUARDIAN DAYANAND SAMBHAJI BOYANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER NILANGA, DIST. LATUR ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. O.D. Totawad h/f. Mr. C.R. Thorat AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.R. Yadav-Lonikar ...

AND 18 WRIT PETITION NO.13548 OF 2023 DIVYA DAYANAND BOYANE THROUGH GUARDIAN DAYANAND SAMBHAJI BOYANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER NILANGA, DIST. LATUR ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. O.D. Totawad h/f. Mr. C.R. Thorat AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.G. Sangale ...

AND 22 WRIT PETITION NO.13564 OF 2023 ANVI VIVEKANAND BOYANE THROUGH GUARDIAN VIVEKANAND SAMBHAJI BOYANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER NILANGA, DIST. LATUR ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. O.D. Totawad h/f. Mr. C.R. Thorat AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.R. Yadav-Lonikar ...

habeeb 1/2

17,18,22 and 23.WP.13547.23.odt AND 23 WRIT PETITION NO.13565 OF 2023 VIRANSH VIVEKANAND BOYANE THROUGH THE GUARDIAN VIVEKANAND SAMBHAJI BOYANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER NILANGA, DIST. LATUR ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. O.D. Totawad h/f. Mr. C.R. Thorat AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.G. Sangale ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

DATE : 30.10.2023 PER COURT :

The petitioner/s in all these petitions who are related by blood have a common grievance. Their applications seeking caste certificate are pending with the respondent who is a competent authority under the provisions of the Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001. 2.

The writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent to pass appropriate order on the petitioner's applications as expeditiously as possible and in any case within two weeks. ( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2