← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11752/2024disposed off

Bharat Suresh Nagamwad v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2024-10-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme3 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:26052-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11752 OF 2024 BHARAT S/O. SURESH NAGAMWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.S. Phatale Addl. GP for Respondents : Mr. P.S. Patil ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 21 OCTOBER 2024 PER COURT [Shailesh P. Brahme, J.]:

Heard both the sides finally considering urgency in the matter.

2.

The petitioner is aggrieved by judgment and order dated 10.10.2024 passed by the Scrutiny Committee, invalidating his certificate of 'Mannervarlu' scheduled tribe. He is relying on numerous validities issued in the family. He has placed on record various orders passed by the co-ordinate benches of High Court granting validities to his blood relatives. He is ready to face the consequences as per Shweta Balaji Isankar Versus State of Maharashtra and Others, in Writ Petition No. 5611/2018. It is, therefore, prayed that conditional validity be issued to him. 3.

Learned AGP supports impugned judgment and order. He would submit that during the course of vigilance incompatible school record was traced out which was suppressed in the matters of earlier validity holders. Without conducting due verification,

they were issued with validity certificates. The Committee has issued show cause notices to the earlier validity holders. Therefore, this is not a fit case to grant any relief on the ground of parity. 4.

We have considered rival submissions of the parties. We have gone through the genealogy which is placed on record at page no. 54.

5.

The respondents do not dispute the relationship of the petitioner with the validity holders. The genealogy shows that almost in every branch there are validity holders. The family members of the petitioner have been issued with validity certificates either by the Committee or pursuant to the orders of High Court.

6.

The petitioner has placed on record the orders passed in following matters of the blood relatives who have been issued with validity certificates :

Sr.

No.

Petition No.

Party Name Order Date Relation 1.

Writ Petition No. 2640 of Sampada D/o. Sunil Nagamwad 09/03/2024 Cousin Sister 2.

Writ Petition No. 7532 of Samiksha D/o.

Sanjay Nagamwad 23/07/2018 Cousin Sister 3.

Writ Petition No. 13909 of Saujanya Sanjay Nagamwad 14/12/2023 Cousin Sister 4.

Writ Petition No. 9653 of Pritee Shivajirao Nagamwad 08/10/2023 Cousin Sister & Cousin Brother Krusha Shivaji Nagamwad 7.

With the assistance of learned counsel for the parties, we have verified that above validity holders are figuring in the genealogy. It further reveals that there was common vigilance

report in the matter of petitioner and others. Sampada Sunil Nagamwad is one of them, who was issued with validity certificate in pursuance of order dated 09.03.2024 passed by the co-ordinate bench in Writ Petition No. 2640/2023. It is evident that self same record was considered in the matter of Sampada. We are of the considered view that the petitioner is entitled to receive validity certificate on the ground of parity.

8.

The Committee has undertaken exercise of reverification. The incompatible school record can be considered during the said enquiry. The petitioner is ready to face the consequences as per Shweta Balaji Isankar (supra). Under these circumstances, we find that the petitioner deserves to be issued with validity certificate, conditionally. We, therefore, pass following order :

ORDER

i.

The Writ Petition is allowed partly.

ii.

The impugned judgment and order dated 10.10.2024 is quashed and set aside.

iii.

Respondent no. 2 - Scrutiny Committee shall immediately issue validity certificate to the petitioner as belonging to 'Mannervarlu' scheduled tribe, which shall be co-terminus with the earlier validities issued in the family.

iv.

The petitioner shall not claim equity.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ] Thakur-Chauhan/-