Vishwambhar Sakharam Thigale And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

38-WP-9899-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9839 OF 2013 Vishwambhar Sakharam Thigale and others ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents.

....

Mr. V.C. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. Satish Godsay, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.G.P. for State.

Mr. M.S. Karad h/f Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

....

CORAM :

T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2018 PER COURT:- 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the proceeding as at present he is not feeling any threat of pulling down of his construction. In view of the statement, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 2.

Interim relief, if any, grated earlier stands vacated. 3.

The petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court again, if there is any cause of action.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE SPR