← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11591/2022disposed off

Gajanan Sarjerao Nagve v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2022-11-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

925 WP 11585 22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 WRIT PETITION NO.11585 OF 2022 VISHNU SHESHRAO AMBHORE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Mane h/f Mr. Pawade Nilkanth R. AGP for Respondents/State : Mrs. M. A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Kadethankar A.B. ...

929 WRIT PETITION NO.11591 OF 2022 GAJANAN SARJERAO NAGVE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Mane h/f Mr. Pawade Nilkanth R. AGP for Respondents/State : Mrs. M. A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Kadethankar A.B.

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 22.11.2022.

PER COURT :

The two petitioners, by their separate petitions, have been seeking inter alia direction to the respondent No. 3-Tahsildar to decide their representations regarding difficulty in contesting and electing a Sarpanch in view of absence of any candidate from OBC category. 3.

The learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are not pressing for prayer clause 'C' and would be contented, if prayer clause 'B' is considered. 4.

The learned A.G.P., on instructions, submits that the respondent No. 3-Tahsildar would consider and decide the representations of petitioners on 1/2

925 WP 11585 22.odt their own merit.

5.

In view of above, we dispose of the writ petitions. The respondent No. 3-Tahsildar shall consider the representations of the petitioners on their own merit and decide the same within a week from the date of appearance of the petitioners.

6.

The petitioners shall appear before the respondent No. 3 Tahsildar on 24.11.2022.

( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 2/2