Abdul Samad Bagwan Abdul Hannan Bagwan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

­ 1 ­

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.32005 OF 2019 (ABDUL SAMAD BAGWAN ABDUL HANNAN BAGWAN VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.32006 OF 2019 (AMOL LAXMANRAO POULE VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.32007 OF 2019 (NOORMOHAMMAD AMIRSAB QURESHI VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.32008 OF 2019 (AZIM SHAIKH KARIM VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.32009 OF 2019 (SANJAY SANTRAM VHAVALE VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.32010 OF 2019 (SHAIKH YUNUS SHAIKH KONDAJI VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) Mr.S.M.Kamble, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.A.M.Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. N.T.Bhagat and Mr.S.W.Munde, AGPs' for respondent No.1. ( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.) DATE : 07/10/2019 PER COURT :

1.

Leave to correct the description of respondent No.1. Correction to be carried out forthwith.

2.

These matters were heard for some time.

khs/Oct. 2019/32005

­ 2 ­ 3.

The learned Advocate for the petitioners sought instructions from the representatives of the petitioners present in the Court and makes a statement on instructions that the petitioners would avail of a remedy of filing an election petitions and these petitions may be allowed to be withdrawn.

4.

In view of the above, these petitions are disposed off, as withdrawn with liberty to avail of a remedy, as is permissible in Law. ( Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.) khs/Oct. 2019/32005