Savita Shankar Danke And ORS v. Syed Gausuddin Syed Hasnuddin And ORS

2024:BHC-AUG:25513 {1} ca13019-23.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13019 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.14605 OF 2018 Savita Shankar Danke and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Syed Gausuddin Syed Hasnuddin and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Aniruddha A. Nimbalkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. A. S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for respondent No.3 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 18 th OCTOBER, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicants submits that he has privately served respondent No.2 and affidavit to that effect is filed on record.

2.

This civil application is filed for restoration with prayer to condone the delay in filing the civil application. 3.

Learned advocate for respondent No. 3 - Insurer has opposed the civil application stating that no case is made out by the applicants for restoration.

{2} ca13019-23.doc 4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "B1". 5.

Office objections to be removed within six weeks. [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca13019-23.doc