Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaike v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Land Acquisition Officer, Sdo Office, Vaijapur, Aurangabad And ANR

{1} ca16605.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16605 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 30860 OF 2022 Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaike Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Ms. Sangeeta S. Phune Patil, advocate holding for Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil, advocate for the Applicant Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 01st February, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 2218 days which appears to be caused due to his fnancial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. Considering the statutory right of the applicant, delay of 2218 days stands condoned subject to the condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay.

{2} ca16605.22.odt Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb