Dadasaheb S/O Shankarrao Pathare (Patare) v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1418 OF 2016 (Dadasaheb s/o Shankarrao Pathare (Patare) Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) ---- Mr. Mobin Shaikh, Advocate holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S.W. Munde, A.P.P. for the respondent/State ---- CORAM :

S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 27th October, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

There is an innocuous prayer in this petition that the respondent No. 2 has not considered the prayer of the petitioner for releasing him on parole and that respondent No. 2 be directed to decide the application filed by the petitioner.

3.

We direct respondent No. 2 to decide the application filed by the petitioner, if already not decided, as expeditiously as possible; however on or before 29th October, 2016 and communicate the said decision to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

criwp1418-2016 4.

The authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the petitioner.

5.

The learned A.P.P. assures this Court that this order would be communicated to the concerned authority immediately.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE npj/criwp1418-2016