Ashok Pandurang Bhange v. Shankarlal Madanlal Pallod

cra6355.131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6355 OF 2013 Ashok Pandurang Bhange ...APPLICANT

VERSUS

Shankarlal s/o Madanlal Pallod ...RESPONDENT ...

Mr.F.K. Patel Advocate h/f. Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar Advocate for Applicant.

None present for Respondent.

...

CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATE : 9TH JANUARY, 2015 ORDER :

1.

In addition to the delay condonation application, notice was issued in this main Application also, but Respondent is absent.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.

Perused record. Looking to the nature of transaction between the parties and reasons

cra6355.132 recorded by the trial Court for acquitting the accused, there is arguable case. As such leave is granted. The Application is allowed. Application be converted into Appeal.

3.

Appeal is Admitted.

4.

Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken against Respondent-accused in the trial Court and report of compliance be called.

5.

Paper Book be got prepared.

[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] asb/JAN15