Sunita Maruti Dhakane v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} cp785.16 .odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 785 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4670 OF 2016 Sunita w/o Maruti Dhakane Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. V.P. Savant, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondents.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 19th APRIL, 2017 PER COURT:

In an affidavit-in-reply presented on behalf of respondent no. 2, it is stated that the directives issued by this Court have been complied with. As such, no cognizance of contempt petition presented by contempt petitioner need be taken. In view of above, contempt petition stands disposed of. ( K. L. WADANE ) ( R.M.BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb