Nilesh Mohansing Rathod And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

{1} crappln3099.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3099 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2021 Nilesh Mohansingh Rathod & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Ms. Poonam V. Bodke, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. V. Dasalkar, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. D. Shinde, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 16th February, 2022.

PC :

Heard.

This application is fled for amendment to the prayer clause in the main petition seeking quashing of the proceedings, since charge sheet has been fled.

In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, Criminal Application No. 3099 of 2021 is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B".

Criminal Application is accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb

{2} crappln3099.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2021 Nilesh Mohansingh Rathod & others Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Ms. Poonam V. Bodke, advocate for the petitioners Mr. R. V. Dasalkar, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. D. Shinde, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 16th February, 2022.

PC :

Copy of the charge sheet is already fled.

Stand over to 09.03.2022.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb