Eknath Ravan Avdhoot v. Manukumar Shristav And Others

1 Sr23CP701.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 701 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9193 OF 2015 Eknath S/o Ravan Avdhoot ... Petitioner

VERSUS

Shri. Manukumar Shristav & Ors.

... Respondents ..........

Mr Shahaji B. Ghatol Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State .............

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 05TH MARCH, 2018.

ORDER:

1.

We have heard Shri. Shahaji B. Ghatol Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri. P. S. Patil, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents No. 3 to 5. 2.

Shri. Patil, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the Officer had not considered the amendment to the Government Resolution of the year 1979. The Officer would reconsider the claim of the petitioner.

2 Sr23CP701.2017 3.

The respondents shall reconsider the claim of the petitioner in view of the Government Resolution of 1979 with relevant amendments dt. 29.11.1979 so also the order of this Court dt.06.10.2016 in Writ Petition No. 9193 of 2015. The respondents assure to reconsider the claim of the petitioner within two months. 4.

The statement made by learned Assistant Government Pleader is accepted.

5.

In view of the fact that, the claim of the petitioner is being reconsidered by the respondents, the impugned communication dt.05.08.2017 shall not subsist.

6.

The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. No costs. [ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde