← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10615/2022delay condonatedrejected

Ramesh S/O Gangaram Pashime v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Latur And ANR

2022-10-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 953 CA-10615.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 953 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10615 OF 2022 IN FAST/32977/2021 WITH CA/10616/2022 IN FAST/33098/2021 RAMESH S/O GANGARAM PASHIME

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Prakash Gunale, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

18.10.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The respondent No.2 Acquiring Body though served but remained absent. 2.

The applicant in both these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in their respective applications which appear to be caused due to their fnancial crisis. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no proper explanation of the delay is there. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods as mentioned in the applications are condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay.

(2) 953 CA-10615.2022.odt 3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections.

4.

Applications are disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde