← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10386/2013disposed offdismissed for default

Vishnu Vithal Aargade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal1 pages

49-WP10386-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10386 OF 2013 Vishnu Vithal Aargade ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents.

....

Mr. A.D. Sugdare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. ...

CORAM :

T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2018 PER COURT:- 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement, on instructions, that cause does not survive. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the proceeding is disposed of as infructuous. Mr. S.T. Shelke, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is present. ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE SPR