Kamal Babasaheb Pathare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(Order) (1) W.P. No. 10265 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 10265 of 2013 Mrs. Jyoti Bharat Deshmukh.

Writ Petition No. 10266 of 2013 Mrs. Shaila Bajirao Bhapkar Writ Petition No. 10267 of 2013 Mrs. Jyoti Bhausaheb Raut

(Order) (2) W.P. No. 10265 of 2013 Writ Petition No. 10268 of 2013 Mrs. Jaheda Mehabub Bagwan Writ Petition No. 10269 of 2013 Ms. Sunita d/o. Karbhari Nanaware

(Order) (3) W.P. No. 10265 of 2013 Writ Petition No. 10270 of 2013 Mrs. Alaka w/o. Vasant Kshirsagar Writ Petition No. 10271 of 2013 Mrs. Varsha w/o. Gulabrao Salawe Writ Petition No. 10272 of 2013 Mrs. Kamal Babasaheb Pathare

(Order) (4) W.P. No. 10265 of 2013 Writ Petition No. 10273 of 2013 Mrs. Sunanda w/o. Mohan Pund Writ Petition No. 10274 of 2013 Mrs. Mangal w/o. Arun Dalvi ...........

Mr. G.K. Naik Thigle, Advocate, holding for Mr. J.R. Shah, Advocate, for petitioners.

Mr. S.B. Joshi, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondents no.01 to 03.

(Order) (5) W.P. No. 10265 of 2013 Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate, for respondent no.04. ...........

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 29TH SEPTEMBER 2017 ORAL ORDER :

01.

Parties appearing in the petitions agree that by passage of time, petitions have been rendered infructuous.

02.

If at all any grievance survives in relation to occurrence of cause in the recent past or in future, it would be open for the petitioners to approach Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad for redressal of their grievances.

03.

With liberty as indicated above, the Writ Petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( R.M. Borde ) JUDGE JUDGE ...........

puranik / WP10265.13etc