← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8815/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Shankar Engineers And Contractors Through Its Proprietor Samir Prakash Patil v. The Union Of India And Others

2019-03-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 WRIT PETITION NO.8815 OF 2018 SHANKAR ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SAMIR PRAKASH PATIL

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner :Mr. Gaikwad Pramod S Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. B. Deshpande and Mr. Dwarkadas S.Ladda Advocate for respondents 2 to 4: Mr. N. M . Navandar Addl. GP for the State: Mr. P. S. Patil

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 11th March, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

We have heard Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Navandar, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4, Mr. Ladda, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and learned A.G.P. Also.

2.

It is submitted by the petitioner and the Railway Department that the supplementary agreement would be executed.

3.

Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel submits that petitioner would approach the Railway within a week. 4.

In view of the guidelines of the Railway 1/2

Department dated 27.10.2017, Mr. Navandar, learned counsel makes a statement that the amount of GST has not been deducted by the Railways from the petitioner. 5.

The supplementary agreement may be executed between the petitioner and Railways as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months if there is no other impediment.

6.

With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(A. M.DHAVALE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC 2/2