← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14323/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Maroti Bapurao Khandagle v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Nanded And ORS

2025-11-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme1 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:30253 75 CA 14323 OF 2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 75 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14323 OF 2023 IN FAST/31669/2023 MAROTI BAPURAO KHANDAGLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR NANDED AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Nagarkar Kiran M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2: Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 03.11.2025 PER COURT :

The applicant seeks condonation of delay of 410 days in preferring appeal.

2.

Despite service of notice the contesting party-respondent no. 3 has not caused appearance. The contents of the application are uncontroverted. There are no mala fides on the part of the applicant to prefer appeal belatedly.

3.

The Civil Application is partly allowed condoning the delay of 410 days on condition that the applicant shall not be entitled to claim interest and the statutory benefits for the delayed period. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 1/1