Sandip Raju Koli v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:10701

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1856 OF 2024 SANDIP RAJU KOLI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Harshal Prakash Randhir APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Sonpawale ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 09.04.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.175/2023, dated 17.11.2023, registered at Kasoda Police Station, Taluka Erandol, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3] This court by order dated 24.10.2024 granted interim protection to the applicant.

4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that thereafter the applicant has cooperated with the investigation.

5] The learned APP submits that thereafter the charge-sheet has been filed in the matter.

6] Considering the above, no further custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary.

7] In view of the above, the interim protection granted by order dated 24.10.2024 stands confirmed, on the following terms:

i] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

ii] The applicant shall co-operate in the proceedings before the trial Court.

8] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

9] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

10] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE marathe