← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11497/2014disposed offdismissed for default

Rani Laxmibai Mahila Kalyan Mandal, Aurangabad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-02-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

51 wp.11497.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11497 OF 2014 RANI LAXMIBAI MAHILA KALYAN MANDAL, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Barlinge S.R.

AGP for Respondents: Mr.A.S.Shinde.

...

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA and V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATE :

04th February, 2015.

P.C.:

.

Mr.Barlinge, learned counsel submits that the proposal is submitted for grant of permission under Rule 3.1 of the Secondary Schools Code. However, the Deputy Director has raised some queries which in fact are not applicable. The same are also clarified by the Petitioner. No final decision has been taken by the Deputy Director. We have heard the learned AGP also The Deputy Director of Education Officer shall take decision on the proposal forwarded to it in respect of the Petitioner seeking permission under Rule 3.1 of the Secondary Schools Code, on its own merits, expeditiously, preferably within four months. The Petitioner may represent itself before the Deputy Director of Education. The Petitioner may clarify regarding the requirement being

51 wp.11497.14.odt fulfilled or otherwise.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. No costs.

[ V. L. ACHLIYA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] ndm