← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12800/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Alka Ashok Deogirikar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-10-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

913to 916 &927

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 WRIT PETITION NO.12800 OF 2019 ALKA ASHOK DEOGIRIKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 914 WRIT PETITION NO.12801 OF 2019 ATMARAM GOVIMNDA BADGUJAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 915 WRIT PETITION NO.12802 OF 2019 MOHINIRAJ JAGGANATH SHIRODE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 916 WRIT PETITION NO.12803 OF 2019 DEVIDAS KALIDAS NEMADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 927 WRIT PETITION NO.12814 OF 2019 PUSHPA BHASKAR NEHETE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr Sontakke Sandeep B Addl. GP for Respondents: Mrs M A Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr Munde Sachin B.

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 15th October, 2019 ORDER:

1.

Issue notice to the respondents.

2.

Learned Addl.GP waives notice for respondent No.1

913to 916 &927 to 3. Mr. Munde, the learned counsel waives notice for respondent No.4.

3.

Learned counsel for respondent no.4 submits that the petitioners have not made any representation to respondent No.4 seeking benefits claimed in the present writ petitions. In light of that the petitioners may make application/representations with respondent No.4 seeking notional benefits as claimed by the petitioners.

4. Respondent No.4 shall consider the claim of the petitioners and take decision upon it within three months from the date of the respective applications of the petitioners. The petitioners may point out the judgment on which they rely.

5.

Writ petitions disposed of. No costs.

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC