Shivabai Harishchandra Pawar Died Through Lrs Bansilal Harishcharndra Pawar @ Jadhav And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad

-:(1):- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16209 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33657 OF 2015 SHIVABAI HARISHCHANDRA PAWAR DIED THROUGH LRS BANSILAL HARISHCHARNDRA PAWAR @ JAD THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR ...

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16208 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33661 OF 2015 RAMA SHANKAR JADHAV THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR ...

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16211 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33663 OF 2015 DATTU RAGHUNATH JADHAV THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR ...

-:(2):- AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16206 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33665 OF 2015 MOHAN BHAGWAN JADHAV THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR ...

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16203 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33667 OF 2015 SHAHURAJ HARISCHANDRA PAWAR THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANOTHER ...

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16194 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33674 OF 2015 MADHAV PANDHARINATH MORE THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANOTHER ...

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16197 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 33676 OF 2015 SUBHASH LAXMAN MORE DIED THROUGH LRS BALAJI SUBHASH MORE AND OTHERS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR ...

AND

-:(3):- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 16196 OF 2015 IN CRA (STAMP) NO. 34820 OF 2015 BABURAO S/O SAMBHAJI DHANERAO THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.COLLECTOR *** Mr. V. V. Ingale, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. V.H.Dighe/ Mr. R.B.Bagul? Mr. D.V.Tele/ Mr. G. O. Wattamwar/ Mr. S. N. Mahajan, AGP for the Respondent/ State.

*** CORAM: T. V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED: 17th DECEMBER, 2015.

PER COURT:

1.

All these civil applications are filed for condonation of delay. Heard both the sides.

2.

In view of the contents of the applications and the submissions made, this Court holds that sufficient ground is made out for condonation of delay. The blame is on the learned counsel. There is no reason for the applicant not to remain present before the Reference Court as applications were filed for enhancement of compensation.

3.

In the result, all the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned.

[T.V. NALAWADE, J.] Dt.17/12/2015 ans/16209