← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/1195/2016disposed off

The State Of Maharashtra And Others v. Sidharam Shrimant Niranje

2023-09-09Lok Adalat3 pages

-1IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. P. BRAHME, HELD ON 09.09.2023 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD 1.FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 33748 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SHASHIKALA SIDRAM JADHAV

2. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1194 OF 2016 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

VERSUS

NAMDEO TATYABA GAIKWAD DIED HIS LRS NARHARI NAMDEO GAIKWAD

3. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1195 OF 2016 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SIDHARAM SHRIMANT NIRANJE

4. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1197 OF 2016 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTA AND OTHER

VERSUS

TAMMA GANPATI VITHALKAR DIED HIS LRS SONABAI AND OTHERS ...

AGP for Appellants : Mr. S. P. Tiwari Advocate for respondent/claimant : Mr. L. C. Patil ....

O R D E R

1.

Except First Appeal Stamp No. 3378 of 2015, remaining appeals are not on board but requested to be taken on board. 2.

The learned AGP Mr. S. P. Tiwari along with Mr. Rajkumar

-2Mane (Dy. Collector) Land Acquisition, Osmanabad as representative of the appellants are present.

3.

The learned A.G.P. on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal in view of the Government resolution No..Sankirna-2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018.

4.

In present matters the enhancement though is not exactly within four times as contemplated by the Government policy stated above, it is slightly and marginally above four times. Considering the over all circumstances of the matters and to save time, money and energy of the stake holders, the appeals are permitted to be withdrawn.

4.

The learned A.G.P on instructions, undertakes to deposit the amount of compensation if not deposited earlier, within a period of six months from today in the reference Court. 5.

On depositing the amount, the respondents/ claimants shall withdraw the same.

6.

The First Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. 7.

The office shall draw an award accordingly.

-38.

The request of the refund of Court fee shall be considered and processed as permissible in law and certificate to that effect be issued. (A.B.Kadethankar) (V.B.Mantri) (Shailesh.P.Brahme) Advocate District Judge (Retd.) Judge Member Member Head of the Panel Date: 09.09.2023 Place: Aurangabad ysk/