Jitendra Mohanlal Jain And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11305 OF 2015 Jitendra Mohanlal Jain and others Vs.The State of Maharashtra and others.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.V.D.Hon, Senior advocate holding for Mr.A.V.Hon, advocate for Petitioners.

Mr.A.G.Magare, A.G.P for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.V.J.Dixit, Senior advocate holding for Mr.V.V.Deshmukh, advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr.P.R.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.5.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND V.K.JADHAV,JJ.

Date : 10.12.2015.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

The matter was heard yesterday. It was adjourned today. Today Mr.Dixit, learned Senior counsel has placed on record Purshis signed by Mr.Mahesh P.Deshmukh and Prof. Shantaram O.Mali, stating that the election programme dated 2.11.2015 is herewith withdrawn. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that Prof.Shantaram O.Mali is not the Secretary. We are not entering into the said dispute in the present matter. The election programme was under the signature of Mr.Mahesh P.Deshmukh and

Prof.Shantaram O.Mali, i.e. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 and they have filed the Purshis which is accepted.

3.

In fact, the whole thrust of the argument was with regard to the election programme and main prayer in the petition is also with regard to the election programme. As the said election programme itself is withdrawn, the purpose of the Writ Petition stands substantially served. Another prayer made was to take action against Respondent Nos.3 and 4 for illegally holding General Body Meeting on 18.10.2015. For the said purpose, this Court need not enter into debate. The parties can move the appropriate authority in that regard. The other prayers in prayer clauses (D) (E) are with regard to the interim orders.

4.

When the main petition itself stands disposed of, no question of considering interim prayers arise. 5.

The Writ Petition as such is disposed of with aforesaid observations. No costs.

(V.K.JADHAV,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.10.12.2015.

asp/office/wp11305.15