Digambar Pandurang Rajpete v. Taslim Siraj Mulani And ORS

(1) 921 CA-14013.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14013 OF 2024 IN X-APLST/31432/2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12483 OF 2021 IN FA/2730/2021 DIGAMBAR PANDURANG RAJPETE

VERSUS

TASLIM SIRAJ MULANI AND OTHERS ...

Mr. S.V. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. P.B. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

5 FEBRUARY 2025.

ORDER:- 1.

Learned Counsel Mr. Jadhav causes appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and seeks time to file Vakalatnama. The learned Counsel for the respondent Insurance Company, despite appearance, remained absent. 2.

Heard rival submissions.

3.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 268 days in filing the appeal. The appeal filed by the Insurance Company against the said award is already admitted. As such, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) subject to condition that the applicant / claimant shall not

(2) 921 CA-14013.2024.odt claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay on the enhanced compensation, if granted.

4.

Appeal be registered after removal of all the office objections, if any.

5.

The application is disposed of.

6.

List the appeal and another application to 05.03.2025. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde