Komal W/O Shubham Kajale v. Shubham S/O Madhukar Kajale
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2024 Komal W/o Shubham Kajale
VERSUS
Shubham S/o Madhukar Kajale ...
Ms. Sawari M. Patil h/f Ms. C. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. B. R. Kedar, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 10th OCTOBER 2025.
PC :- 1.
Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.
2.
Though this application is filed with a prayer to transfer the proceeding bearing Hindu Marriage Petition No. 276/2025 from the Court of learned CJSD, Junnar, Dist. Pune to the Court of learned CJSD, Ahmednagar, now it is informed that the Court is established at Rahuri having jurisdiction over the area where wife resides. The learned Advocate for the applicant therefore seeks leave to amend the prayer clause.
( 2 ) 3.
Leave granted.
4.
In the prayer clause, the word, "Ahmednagar" be replaced by word, "Rahuri". Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today.
5.
The applicant-wife has filed this application mainly on the grounds that (i) she is residing with her parents. (ii) there is no one in a position to accompany her to attend the Court proceedings at Junnar. (iii) Three proceedings are already pending in the Court at Rahuri and (iv) a three years son is residing with the wife which adds to her difficulty in undertaking travel to Junner for attending the court dates. The learned Advocate therefore submits that this is a fit case to transfer the proceeding to Rahuri.
6.
The learned Advocate Mr. Kedar vehemently opposed the application. However, he admits that two-three proceedings are already filed and pending at Rahuri.
7.
Considering that, it is difficult for wife to attend the Court at Junnar, this Court is inclined to allow the application. Hence, the
( 3 ) following order:
ORDER
(i) Misc. Civil Application stands allowed.
(ii) The proceedings of Hindu Marriage Petition No.276/2025 pending before the learned CJSD, Junnar, Dist. Pune stands transferred to the Court of learned CJSD, Rahuri.
(iii) After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. In case the Trial Court finds that the adjournments are unnecessarily sought, the Trial Court may deal with such application, so as to compensate the respondent-husband, if he personally remains present.
(iv) Whenever request is made by the respondent-husband seeking permission to appear through video conferencing, the same shall be considered liberally by the trial Court.
(v) With this, Misc. Civil Application stands disposed off. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]