Suryabhan Ashok Patil And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

{1} crappln658.20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3168 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 658 OF 2020 Suryabhan Ashok Patil & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. V. P. Patil, advocate for applicants Mr. R. V. Dasalkar, A. P. P. for Respondent No.1. Mr. Akash Ingle, advocate holding for Mr. B. R. Kedar, advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 07th January, 2022.

PC :

Heard.

Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 has strongly resisted the application on the ground that this application is fled belatedly, however, applicants-accused appeared in Regular Criminal Case pending before the learned Magistrate on 14.09.2021, though the charge sheet came to be fled in December 2020.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". Criminal Application is accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V. K. JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb

{2} crappln658.20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 658 OF 2020 Suryabhan Ashok Patil & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. V. P. Patil, advocate for applicants Mr. R. V. Dasalkar, A. P. P. for Respondent No.1. Mr. Akash Ingle, advocate holding for Mr. B. R. Kedar, advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 07th January, 2022.

PC :

Copy of the charge sheet is already fled.

Stand over to 04th February, 2022, for hearing. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V. K. JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb