Pandurang Arjun Kayande v. The Regional Manager And Others
{1} 914 sr. no..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11697 OF 2015 PANDURANG ARJUN KAYANDE
VERSUS
THE REGIONAL MANAGER AND OTHERS . . .
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kishor C. Sant. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. S.S. Dande. AGP for Respondent No.3 : Mr. V. H. Dighe.
. . .
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2016.
PER COURT:
1] We have heard Mr. Sant, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dande, learned counsel for the respondents. 2] Affidavit in reply is filed by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the proposal received from the petitioner is forwarded to the higher authorities for decision. As yet, no decision is taken.
3] In the light of the above, present writ petition is premature. The petitioner will have a right to proceed in case the higher authority decides against the petitioner. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-