← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13084/2024disposed off

Mahesh Nanabhau Patil And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others

2024-12-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:28334-DB 38-WP.12996-24 & ors.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 38 WRIT PETITION NO. 12996 OF 2024 DIPAK DHANRAJ PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 43 WRIT PETITION NO. 13055 OF 2024 MADHURI GOKUL PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 47 WRIT PETITION NO. 13063 OF 2024 RAVINDRA SUDAM PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 53 WRIT PETITION NO. 13084 OF 2024 MAHESH NANABHAU PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners in all WP : Mr. Bachate Pralhad D. AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. P. S. Patil, Ms. P. V. Diggikar, Mr. S. K. Tambe, Mr. V. M. Kagne, respectively. ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 02.12.2024

38-WP.12996-24 & ors.odt PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the respective learned counsels.

2.

The petitioners who are approved teachers are before this Court as their proposals for including them in the Shalarth Pranali are still waiting for decision. The proposals are pending before respondent No.2/Deputy Director of Education for considerable period.

3.

Respondent No.2 shall also take into consideration the fact that the deficiencies which were notified earlier have also been removed. The petitioners and the Management would be at liberty to produce the relevant documents before respondent No.2.

4.

Writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the proposals pending before him within six (6) weeks from today on its merit. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-