Sachin Ganpat Makne v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 Sr77 WP12620.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 12620 OF 2017 Dr. Sachin S/o. Ganpat Makne ... Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ..........

Mr N. B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State .............

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 08TH JANUARY, 2018.

ORDER:

1.

Mr Suryawanshi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was appointed on 13.01.2015 initially for a period of 120 days and by giving a technical break of one day, the services of the petitioner were continued till 02.09.2015. Thereafter, again the petitioner was selected on 02.12.2016 from open and physical handicapped quota. The petitioner was issued order on temporary basis as an Assistant Professor, Pediatric Dentistry, till the MPSC selected candidate available or regular appointee is transferred. Thereafter, on 17.04.2017, appointment order of 120 days was given by giving technical break of one day. The same process was followed

2 Sr77 WP12620.2017 while giving appointment order dt. 22.08.2017. As per the said appointment order, the term of the petitioner was upto 13.12.2017, however, in the interregnum a bonded candidate was sought to be appointed in place of the petitioner. The petitioner filed Original Application before the Tribunal along with a prayer for interim orders. The prayer for interim order was not granted. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has approached this Court. 2.

It would appear that, even as per the appointment order in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner's term was upto 13.12.2017. The said period is over. The Original Application is pending. In view of the fact that the term is over, at present, in the present writ petition no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 3.

The petitioner may agitate his contentions in the Original Application.

4.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde