Amol Walmik Yelkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

cran3215.21 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3215 OF 2021 AMOL WALMIK YELKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f Mr. Patil Kalyan V. APP for Respondent-State: Mrs. D. S. Jape .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR. C. MORE, JJ.

DATED : 25th FEBRUARY, 2022 PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard learned counsel for the applicant for some time.

2.

We have expressed our disinclination to entertain this application for the sole reason that the crime is of the year 2016 and the charge sheet also came to be submitted in the year 2016 itself. Learned counsel has pointed out to us that the applicant is selected for the post of police constable with Nagpur Police, however, because of pendency of this case, he is not getting the appointment order. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Learned counsel, however, submits that the trial court may be directed to decide the case which is of the year 2016, as expeditiously as possible.

cran3215.21 -23.

Leave granted. The application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to file application before the trial court for expeditious hearing of the case and upon filing such application, the trial court shall decide the case as expeditiously as possible, within reasonable time.

4.

Criminal application is accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR. C. MORE, J.) (V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/