The State Of Maharashtra v. Dr.Prashant Navanitlal Gujarathi

cra6541.13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6541 OF 2013 The State of Maharashtra, Through Dr. Sambhaji Patil, Medical Officer, Rural Hospital, Parola, Dist-Jalgaon.

...APPLICANT (Orig. Complainant)

VERSUS

Dr. Prashant Navnitlal Gujarathi, Age-44 years, Occu:Medical Practitioner, R/o-Parola, Tq-Parola, Dist-Jalgaon.

...RESPONDENT (Orig. Accused) ...

Mrs.R.K. Ladda , A.P.P. for Applicant - State. Mr. N.R. Thorat Advocate h/f. Mr. A.K. Tiwari Advocate for Respondent.

...

CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATE : 3RD MARCH, 2015 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard learned A.P.P. for State. Advocate Shri Tiwari for Respondent is not present. There

cra6541.13 is no leave note of Advocate Shri Tiwari. On his behalf, time is sought.

2.

I have gone through the record. The reasons recorded by the trial Court vis-a-vis the reasons recorded by the Appellate Court need to be considered. It is necessary to re-appreciate the evidence. As such leave is granted. The Application is allowed. Application be converted into Appeal.

3.

Appeal is Admitted.

4.

Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken against Respondent-accused in the trial Court and brief compliance report be called.

5.

Paper Book be got prepared.

[A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.] asb/MAR15