Rajkumar Virbhadrappa Barole v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:27323-DB 918.WP.12288.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12288 OF 2024 RAJKUMAR VIRBHADRAPPA BAROLE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dixit Sushant V. AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. P.J. Bharad Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Bondar Uttam Bajirao ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 21.11.2024 PER COURT:

We have heard the learned advocate Mr. S.V. Dixit for the petitioner and Mr. U.B. Bondar for the respondent No.2 - Zilla Parishad, Latur. They are unanimous that irrespective of the order of remand passed by the Supreme Court in a PIL on the basis of which a crime was registered, a decision was taken by the Chief Executive Officer by order dated 29.02.2024 (Exhibit-J) extending all the retiral benefits inter alia to the petitioner still those have been stated to be withheld. 2.

In view of above, the writ petition is allowed as prayed for. All the retiral benefits payable to the petitioner together with statutory interest, shall be collected and disbursed, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within 90 days.

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb/ 1/1