← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13807/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Kamal Kalyan Sarode And ORS v. Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Depot Controller

2024-01-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare2 pages

42- C.A. No. 13807-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13807 OF 2023 IN FA/2904/2023 Kamal Kalyan Sarode And Ors ....Applicants

VERSUS

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Depot Controller .....Respondent .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Tungar Nikhilesh K. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.V. Rotte ....

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 19.01.2024 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel for the respondent/appellant. 2.

The appellant has impugned the award on the ground that the applicant No.2 is major brother and applicant No.3 is a married sister of the deceased. Therefore, the multiplicant should not be 1/3, but it would be 1/2. They were not dependents on the deceased. Only the mother was entitled to claim the compensation. However, the Tribunal has committed error of law and mistakenly applied the incorrect multiplicant. Therefore, the amount of compensation has

42- C.A. No. 13807-2023.odt been exceeded. She also submitted that applicant No.3, was sister of the deceased has suggested in the cross-examination that she is residing with her husband. In such circumstances, the applicants are not entitled to withdraw the entire amount.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the claimant Nos.2 and 3 were the dependents. One of them was the major brother. Considering the definition of 'dependent' for the purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act unless the siblings are dependents they are not entitled to the compensation. The married sister is also not held to be a dependent, unless dependency is proved. There appears substance in the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant. Hence, the following order is passed :-

ORDER

(i) The application is partly allowed.

(ii) The applicant No.1 is allowed to withdraw Rs. 8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh) with proportionate interest on the undertaking that she would deposit the money if the award is reversed.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE ysk