Ravindra @ Ravi Devidas Ghogale v. The State Of Maharashtra

cran6199.16 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATIOIN NO. 6199 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 658 OF 2016 RAVINDRA @ RAVI DEVIDAS GHOGALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satej S. Jadhav APP for Respondents: Mr. A.R. Kale .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2016 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard.

2.

The applicant-accused is convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner by judgment and order dated 14.10.2016, in Sessions Case No. 29 of 2012, for the offence punishable under Section 324 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. thereby sentencing him to suffer R.I. for 03 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- i/d to suffer S.I. for one month. By this application, the applicant original accused is seeking suspension of substantive part of sentence and also for getting released on bail till disposal of appeal.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant original accused submits that during the course of trial, the applicant accused was on bail and the

cran6199.16 -2applicant accused has also deposited the fine amount before the trial Court. In view of the fact that the applicant accused was on bail during the course of trial, before the Sessions Court, I am inclined to allow this application. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order:-

O R D E R

I.

Criminal application is hereby allowed.

II.

The substantive part of sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner in Sessions Case No. 29 of 2012, as aforesaid, stands suspended till disposal of accompanying criminal appeal and till then the applicant-accused Ravindra @ Ravi Devidas Ghogale, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount. Bail before the trial court. Humdast allowed. III.

Criminal application is disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/