The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Santosh Bhagwan Selake

ca.2296.14 & ors.doc - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2296 OF 2014 IN FAST/34483/2013 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

SANTOSH BHAGWAN SELAKE ...

AGP for Applicants : Mr.S.P. Sonpawale.

Advocate for non-applicant : Mr.C.K.Shinde.

WITH CA/2294/2014 IN FAST/34585/2013 WITH CA/2298/2014 IN FAST/34582/2013 .....

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 24.11.2015 ORDER :

1] This is an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal by the State challenging the award of the learned reference Court. The delay is of 1369 days. 2] Heard the learned AGP appearing for the applicants. Shri Shinde, learned counsel appearing for the non applicant vehemently argued that, the delay is not properly explained and it be condoned only on the condition that the State should deposit entire amount of compensation. Such can not be a consideration of condonation of delay.

ca.2296.14 & ors.doc - 2 - 3] The averments made in applications are not controverted by filing counter. Delay is sufficiently explained. Hence the same is condoned. First Appeals be registered.

[A.M. BADAR] JUDGE.

Tandale/-sr.no.910