Dada Punjaram Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14477 OF 2017 Vasant Totaram Koli WRIT PETITION NO. 14479 OF 2017 Kishor Pandharinath Patil WRIT PETITION NO. 14480 OF 2017 Mira Motiram Pawar WRIT PETITION NO. 14481 OF 2017 Ramrao Madhavrao Patil

( 2 ) WRIT PETITION NO. 14482 OF 2017 Lata Shantaram More WRIT PETITION NO. 14483 OF 2017 Asha Aabaji Nerkar WRIT PETITION NO. 14484 OF 2017 Surekha Himmatrao Deore WRIT PETITION NO. 14485 OF 2017 Lalita Raghunath Jadhav WRIT PETITION NO. 14486 OF 2017

( 3 ) Dada Punjaram Thakur WRIT PETITION NO. 14487 OF 2017 Vijaya Laxmanrao Khayambayate WRIT PETITION NO. 14488 OF 2017 Sahebrao Shanabhau Girase WRIT PETITION NO. 14489 OF 2017 Ravindra Naval Deore WRIT PETITION NO. 14490 OF 2017

( 4 ) Bapu Gulabsingh Pardhi WRIT PETITION NO. 14491 OF 2017 Bhaskar Daga Patil WRIT PETITION NO. 14492 OF 2017 Prabhakar Narayan Chachare WRIT PETITION NO. 14493 OF 2017 Gokul Tryamak Patil WRIT PETITION NO. 14494 OF 2017 Madhukar Pitambar Mali

( 5 ) WRIT PETITION NO. 14495 OF 2017 Umrao Sahebrao Borse WRIT PETITION NO. 14496 OF 2017 Pitambar Mayaram Patil WRIT PETITION NO. 14497 OF 2017 Kishor Chunilal Gadilohar WRIT PETITION NO. 14498 OF 2017 Devidas Daulat Mahale WRIT PETITION NO. 14499 OF 2017

( 6 ) Chitramadhu Madhukar Badhane Shri. P. B. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri. A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent/State. Shri N.N.Desale, advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATED : 3 rd May, 2018 PER COURT:

.

The grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioners are awardees of "Adarsh Shikshak Puraskar", additional one increment though entitled to is not been given. No cognizance is also taken by the respondents of the same. The respondents be directed to give benefit of one advance increment on the basis of the order of the Chief Executive Officer. 2.

Mr. Desale, the learned advocate for the respondents submits that in case the petitioners approach the C.E.O. and file applications, the same would be scrutinized and the decision would be taken accordingly. 3.

The petitioners may apply to the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. On

( 7 ) receiving the applications, the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 / competent authority shall scrutinize the said applications after considering the order of C.E.O. and Circular dated 12.12.2000 and all other relevant Circulars/GR and thereafter take decision upon the applications within a period of four

(04) months from the date of receipt of applications. 4.

In case, after the decision the petitioners are found entitled to the advance increment as claimed by them then benefit shall be accorded to the petitioners in tune with the decision expeditiously and preferably within six

(06) months.

5.

The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. [ A. M. DHAVALE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] ass/wp 14477.17