Vinayak Ramrao Chakkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

WP-238.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 238 OF 2015 Vinayak s/o Ramrao Chakkar .. Petitioner vs The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents --- Mr. Kiran D. Jadhav, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.N. Kendre, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondents no. 1 to 3 Mrs. Suvarna Zaware, Advocate h/f Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent no.4 CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

27TH APRIL, 2016 ORDER :

1.

After hearing parties, learned counsel for petitioner resiles to a situation whereunder he may explore possibility of prosecuting alternate remedy. In view of the same, he seeks leave to withdraw writ petition with liberty to avail of alternate remedy. 2.

Leave granted. Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

3.

Needless to say that the period consumed during pendency of writ petition would be appropriately considered. SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE pnd