Rohan Dnyaneshwar Bankar v. The State Of Maharashtra
2024:BHC-AUG:28194 1 126
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 126 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2075 OF 2024 ROHAN DNYANESHWAR BANKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...
Advocate for Applicant :
Mr. Sohail Subhedar h/f. Mr. Ghanekar Nilesh S. APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 02nd DECEMBER, 2024 PER COURT:
1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2] The applicant is seeking bail as he was arrested in connection with Crime No.192/2024 dated 04.05.2024, registered with Satara Police Station, District Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 of IPC. 3] The learned counsel for the applicant relies upon the order dated 21.10.2024 passed in the case of Vaibhav Atul Ugale Vs. The State of Maharashtra in Bail Application No.1793 of 2024. The learned counsel submits that the applicants role is identical to Vaibhav (supra), so also, in the case of Rohit Ramesh Kalkumbe Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another, to whom bail is granted by order dated 07.07.2024 in Bail Application No.949 of 2024.
2 126 4] The learned counsel has pointed out evidence of Sagar, who is eye-witness and relying upon the same, bail has been granted to Vaibhav.
5] In the instant case, in the altercation that happened between the victim and all the accused one Mr. Vishal removed the knife from his pocket and stabbed the victim. The role of the present applicant being identical to Vaibhav and Rohit (supra), bail is also granted to the present applicant.
6] In view of the above, the application is allowed in the following terms :
a] The applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.192/2024 dated 04.05.2024, registered with Satara Police Station, District Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 of IPC, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
b] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial.
c] The applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and he shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing.
3 126 d] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and he shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.
e] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of his Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change. 7] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled.
8] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove. 9] The application stands disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe