Murlidhar Dhondu Mahajan v. Sitaram Eknath Chaudhari And ANR

38-CA-18499-2010 Sushma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18499 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3623 OF 2008 Murlidhar Dhondu Mahajan ... Applicant

Versus

Sitaram Eknath Chaudhari and another ... Respondents ...

Mr. Girish Rane - Advocate for Applicant Mr. U.S. Malte - Advocate for Respondent no. 1 ....

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATE : 03rd March, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Learned Advocate appearing for the applicant states that he has written instructions dated 27th February, 2023, received from the son of the applicant that the applicant is bed ridden and for the reasons stated in the letter, the applicant do not want to proceed with the Second Appeal as well as the application filed for condonation of delay in filing the Second Appeal. The written communication dated 27th February, 2023, is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification.

1/2

38-CA-18499-2010 2.

In view of the said written communication, learned Advocate seeks leave to withdraw the application for condonation of delay as well as Second Appeal.

3.

Leave granted as prayed.

4.

Civil Application as well as Second Appeal are disposed of as withdrawn.

[ GAURI GODSE, J. ] 2/2