Girishchandra Chhotalal Pipariya v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

wp3685.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3685 OF 2016 Girishchandra Chhotalal Pipariya .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.G. Talhar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.J. Salgare, AGP for the State.

===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J.

DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2016.

PER COURT :

1.

In view of availability of alternate remedy as provided under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, writ petition need not be entertained. Keeping the option to avail of remedies available in law, open for the petitioner, writ petition stands disposed of. 2.

Revisional authority dealing with the revision application may consider the time spent in prosecuting the remedy of writ petition before this Court while considering the application for condonation of delay that may be presented by petitioner.

( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb