← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12747/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Atmaram Jagannath Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2017-11-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi4 pages

1 W.P.No.12747/17 UNREPORTED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE

AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.12747 OF 2017 Atmaram Jagannath Patil, Age 54 years, Occ.Legal Practitioner(Advocate), R/o Morgaon, Tq.Raver, Dist.Jalgaon.

At present R/o Plot No.34, Govardhan Kunj, N-4, CIDCO, Aurangabad, Tq. and Dist.

Aurangabad.

... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Social Justice Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai--32.

2. District Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Jalgaon, Dist.Jalgaon through its Member Secretary.

... Respondents.

...

Mr.M.S.Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.W.Munde, A.G.P. for the State.

...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,JJ.

Date : 02.11.2017.

2 W.P.No.12747/17 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1.

Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.

2.

Mr.Deshmukh, learned counsel submits that the petitioner is issued with the caste certificate of 'Kunbi' (OBC). The petitioner had submitted proposal seeking verification of his caste claim with the Respondent No.2 Committee, however, the same is not accepted on the ground that it is not submitted through any institution. The learned counsel submits that even if an individual submits the proposal, the Committee has to verify it.

3.

We have heard learned A.G.P.

4.

Time and again, we have directed the Respondent No.2 Committee to accept the proposal for verification of the caste claim even if the said proposal is submitted by the individual provided that the proposal is in a proper format.

3 W.P.No.12747/17 5.

The Respondent No.2 Committee shall accept the proposal submitted by the petitioner in proper format for verification of his caste claim. Upon submission of the proposal in a proper format for verification of his caste claim by the petitioner, the Respondent No.2 Committee shall decide the same expeditiously, preferably within four (4) months. The petitioner shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the said proceedings.

6.

Rule accordingly made absolute in above terms. No costs.

Sd/- Sd/- (SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp12747.17

4 W.P.No.12747/17