Fahim Sultana Kazi Khusro v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

*1* 51t54wp1246o16group

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 WRIT PETITION NO. 1246 OF 2016 FAHIM SULTANA KAZI KHUSRO

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 52 WRIT PETITION NO. 1247 OF 2016 KHAJA ATIKHUJJAMA FARUQUI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 53 WRIT PETITION NO. 1248 OF 2016 SAYYAD ABDUL IRFAN MOHAMMAD RASHID

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 54 WRIT PETITION NO. 1250 OF 2016 KAZI MUJIBUR RAHEMAN ABDUL RAHEMAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Tungar Hrishikesh V. AGP for Respondents 1 to 5/ State : Shri S.K.Tambe and Shri S.R.Yadav Lonikar.

Advocate for Respondent 6 : Shri Madhav P. Gude. ...

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE :- 12th March, 2018

*2* 51t54wp1246o16group Per Court:

I have heard the learned Advocates for the Petitioners and Respondent No.6 along with the learned AGP on behalf of the State. It is pointed out by the learned Advocate for Respondent No.6 and the learned AGP that an enquiry under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which has been challenged in these petitions, has already been concluded and these petitions are rendered infructuous.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners would prefer to challenge the outcome of the enquiry by resorting to a remedy as may be permissible in law and all contentions be kept open.

Considering the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed of as being infructuous with liberty to the Petitioners to avail of a remedy as may be permissible in law. All contentions of all the litigating sides are kept open.

kps (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)