← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2463/2017delay condonatedrejected

Shatrughna Sangram Kendre And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2022-11-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2463 OF 2017 IN X-OBJST/34619/2016 SHATRUGHNA SANGRAM KENDRE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sakolkar Vijay G.

AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.11.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submission. The applicants / original claimants are seeking condonation of delay of 381 days in filing cross objection which appears to be caused due to ignorance of legal provisions. However that cannot be a proper reason. The learned AGP opposed the application on that count only. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants /claimants, the delay of 381 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period, if the amount is enhanced.

2.

The cross-objections be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-