← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/651/2020admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Manikrao Gundharrao Dhokar Died Lrs Ravikant v. Baburao Gundharrao Dhokar Died Lrs Kamlabai And ORS

2024-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 926 CA-1884.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1884 OF 2019 IN SA/12/2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 651 OF 2020 IN SA/12/2016 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2016 IN SA/12/2016 MANIKRAO GUNDHARRAO DHOKAR DIED LRS RAVIKANT

VERSUS

BABURAO GUNDHARRAO DHOKAR DIED LRS KAMLABAI AND OTHERS ...

Mr. N.K. Tungar and Mr. P.M. Kulkarni, Advocates for the applicants.

Mr. Estling Murge, Advocate for respondent Nos.9 and 11. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

4 OCTOBER 2024 ORDER:- IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1884 OF 2019 :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The application is filed for bringing legal representatives of respondent No.7B Babu @ Satish Pandurang Pandhare on record, who admittedly died on 06.01.1996, by condoning the delay of 2580 days. Though the application is opposed, but considering the right to sue the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C) subject to cost of Rs.

(2) 926 CA-1884.2019.odt 4000/- to be paid to Library, Advocates' Association of Bombay High Curt, Bench at Aurangabad. Amendment be carried out within stipulated period, after deposit of cost. The application is disposed of.

IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 651 OF 2020 :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The application is filed for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1A Kamlabai Baburao Dhokar on record, by condoning the delay of 33 days. However, it appears that the legal heirs i.e. respondent Nos.1B and 1 C are already on record. Under such circumstances, the respondent No.1A be shown as "since deceased". The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde