← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8482/2014disposed offdismissed for default

Raghunath Puna Chaudhari v. Dharma Puna Chaudhari And Others

2015-02-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8482 OF 2014 RAGHUNATH PUNA CHAUDHARI

VERSUS

DHARMA PUNA CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A M Gholap ...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: February 18, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the petitioner who is the original defendant no.1 died. The explanation to Section 141 of Civil Procedure Code makes it clear that, the provisions of Order 22 do not apply to Writ proceedings. Thus, rule as to abatement do not apply to writs. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he has no further instructions in the matter.

2.

It appears that, the petitioner who was the original defendant No.1 has preferred the appeal which came to be dismissed in default by the District Judge-2, Jalgaon. The L.Rs of the petitioner may take steps in the matter, if right to sue survives.

3.

In view of this, writ petition stands disposed of. ( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ...

aaa/-