← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11474/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Prashant Arun Lolge v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-11-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema2 pages

{1} wp1147415.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11474 OF 2015 Prashant s/o Arun Lolge Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.A.P.Bhandari, advocate for the petitioner Mr.A.R.Borulkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1, 2 & 4. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11475 OF 2015 Hindavi Education Trust, Nighoj, taluka Parner, District Ahmednagar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.Anil S. Bajaj, advocate for the petitioner Mr.C.V.Dharurkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 5, 8 & 11. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 24th November, 2015 PER COURT:

Respective petitioners contend that in view of the order passed by this Court in PIL No.66 of 2014, construction raised by them over the property belonging to them is being pulled down. It is the contention of petitioners that though they have not encroached over the concerned property and that the title vests in them, they are being removed under the garb of the

{2} wp1147415.odt orders, referred to above.

It would not be appropriate at this stage to enter into the question as to whether petitioners do have title in respect of concerned property. The Tahsildar, who has issued impugned notices on 16.11.2015, shall consider contentions of respective petitioners and only after drawing a conclusion in respect of status of the petitioners as encroacher, it would be permissible for the Tahsildar to take appropriate steps.

Till consideration of objection of the petitioners, no coercive action be taken against them.

Both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.

A.I.S.CHEEMA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp1147415