← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14031/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Yamunabai Laxman Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2025-12-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh4 pages

63 and 68.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 63 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14031 OF 2025 IN RAST/32278/2025 Yamunabai Laxman Kamble

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...

Mr. Jadhav Kailas B, Advocate for Applicant Mr. V. K.Kotecha, AGP for Respondents/State ...

AND 68 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14072 OF 2025 IN RAST/32276/2025 Pandurang Dharuji Kamble And Anr

VERSUS

The State Of Mah And Ors ...

Mr. Jadhav Kailas B, Advocate for Applicant Mr. V. K.Kotecha, AGP for Respondents/State ....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 22.12.2025 PER COURT :- Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. V. K. Kotecha, learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.

These are the applications for condonation of delay of 2926 days caused in filing the review applications.

(( 2 )) Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned AGP for the Respondents/State.

The learned AGP for respondents/State strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay.

Perused the applications. For the reasons stated therein, the applications deserve to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence the following order:

Civil Applications are allowed.

The delay of 2926 days caused in filing the Review applications is hereby condoned.

c.

The applications are disposed of.

REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO.32278 OF 2025 REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO.32276 OF 2025 Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2-State. These review applications are filed by the applicants / claimants for review of the order dated 23.08.2017.

(( 3 )) Perused the applications. Heard learned advocates for both sides.

Learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2 strongly opposed the applications.

Considering the reasons stated in the applications, the applications deserve to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence, the following order:

The review applications are allowed by setting aside the order dated 23.08.2017 passed in Civil Application Nos.10916 of 2017 and 10917 of 2017.

CAST. NO/8076/2012 IN FAST/8075/2012 and CAST NO/8135/2012 IN FAST/8134/2012 are restored to their original stage.

CAST NO/8076/2012 IN FAST/8075/2012 CAST NO/8135/2012 IN FAST/8134/2012 Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. V. K. Kotecha, learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State. These are the applications for condonation of delay of 1269 days caused in filing the First Appeals.

(( 4 )) Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned AGP for the Respondents/State.

The learned AGP for respondents/State strongly opposed the applications and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay.

Perused the applications. For the reasons stated therein, the applications deserve to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence the following order:

Civil Applications are allowed.

The delay of 1269 days caused in filing the First Appeals is hereby condoned.

c.

The applications are disposed of.

FAST NO/8075/2012 FAST NO/8134/2012 Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 23.02.2026. Learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2-State. Call Record and Proceedings.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav