The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Dhondiba Laximan Ghagare

(1) C. A. No. 2317 of 2014 & Group

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2317 OF 2014 IN FAST/34855/2013 WITH CA/2314/2014 IN FAST/34792/2013 WITH CA/2318/2014 IN FAST/34859/2013 WITH CA/2320/2014 IN FAST/34865/2013 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

NAMDEO DHONDIBA GHAGARE .........................

Advocate for Applicants : Smt. S.S. Raut, Asst. Govt. Pleader Advocate for Non-applicants : Shri C.K. Shinde ..........................

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 2ND DECEMBER 2015 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for applicants and Shri Shinde, the learned Counsel appearing for respective non-applicants / original claimants.

2.

According to the learned Assistant Government Pleader, enhancement in compensation is without there being evidence on record justifying the same. As against this, Shri Shinde, the learned Counsel appearing for non-applicants submits that as the impugned award is a money decree, it cannot be stayed.

(2) C. A. No. 2317 of 2014 & Group 3.

Considering the quantum of enhancement, the impugned judgment and award shall be stayed till disposal of appeals, on condition that the applicant - State should deposit entire amount under the award within a period of six weeks from today.

4.

Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of. ( A.M. BADAR ) JUDGE ................................

puranik / CA2317.14etc