Mohansinh Dhondusinh Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtr Through Its Secretary And Others

59wp13201-23&105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 59 WRIT PETITION NO.13201 OF 2023 ALKA VITTHAL ADSUL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 105 WRIT PETITION NO.13297 OF 2023 MOHANSINH DHONDUSINH THAKUR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Mr. E. S. Murge, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. A. V. Deshmukh and Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents State Mr. S. B. Ghute, Advocate for Respondents 3 & 4

CORAM

: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 25th October, 2023 ORDER:

1.

The Petitioners have put forth an identical prayer clause [B], which reads as under:- "[B] By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or directions in the like nature, Respondent no.3, Chief Executive Officer may kindly be directed to consider and decide claims/representations of the petitioner annexed at EXH-C in the light of circular dt. 28.06.2018 and G.R. dated 21.06.2023, for changing the postings of the petitioner by opening the posts of compulsory vacancies."

59wp13201-23&105 2.

The learned Advocate representing Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submits, on instructions, that the representations put forth by the Petitioners would be decided by the Respondents. 3.

In view of the above, the Petitioners are satisfied. 4.

These Writ Petitions are, therefore, disposed off. 5.

Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 should respond to the representations, in the light of the circular dated 28.06.2018, within six weeks and convey the decision to the Petitioners within three weeks thereafter.

( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) JPChavan